Sunday, May 26, 2013

CSU #4


Article:                                     Is Palestine now a state?
By:                                               Pamela Falk
Date:                        November 30, 2012
URL:                          http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57556382/is-palestine-now-a-state/CBS News/

Summary:
Falk’s article, Is Palestine now a state?, follows the United Nations General Assembly’s vote to change Palestine’s UN status from an Observer Entity to an Observer State. Based on this event, Falk explores the questions of what Palestine really gained and whether or not Palestine is now a State. 
According to the United Nations (U.N.), recognition of a new State is an action that can only be taken by other States and Governments. Because the U. N. is not a State or a Government, it has no authority to recognize any State or a Government.”  Additionally, a state can be recognized as a state by other countries and not be a part of the U.N.   Examples of this are the Holy See (Vatican City, a microstate) and Kosovo. The United States recognizes 195 states, but there are only 193 members of the U.N. Falk also clarifies that the U.S. opinion is that Palestine’s status change does not establish them as a state.
State recognition by International Law follows the 1933 Montevideo Convention on the Rights and Duties of States, which lists five the criteria for a state "possess a permanent population, a defined territory, a government and the capacity to enter into relations with other States."  However, in 1948, the World Court added five other criteria for states seeking full U.N. membership.  Those seeking full membership must be a state, must be peace-loving, must accept the obligations of the U.N. charter, must be in a position to carry out the conditions and must be willing to do so. The U.N. Security Council previously declined the Palestinian bid for full membership in 2011 because of questions about their ability to meet "peace loving" requirement, and the lack of effective governmental control over the Gaza Strip by the Palestinian Authority.
What Palestine did gain from the change in status to observer state is the ability to apply for membership in specialized U.N. agencies and international organizations.  Falk also points out that there are questions that might be raised out of the "statehood" status at the U.N. like will this give the Palestinians the right of self defense under Chapter VII of the U.N. Charter.
Falk concludes, that the Resolution does not "recognize" Palestine as a state and that the more important issue coming out of the Resolution is the stress it placed on the urgent need for quickly resuming negotiations.  Negotiation is key, according to both Israel and the Palestinian authority, to a real two-state solution.


Analysis:
                  The ongoing conflict between Palestine and Israel is a hotly contested issue with advocates for both sides. The change in Palestine’s status from Observer Entity to Observer State in November of 2012, generated a great deal of discussion about whether or not Palestine is now officially a state. However, Falk’s article does not take sides or discuss the ongoing conflict. Instead, the article focuses on whether an international organization, the United Nations, can recognize a state and how International Law evaluates a state. The Barron’s definiton of a state  is “a politically organized territory that is adminstered by a soverign government and is recognized by the international community.” Although, the UN vote to change Palestine’s status was supported by a majority of countries, the US and eight other countries including Canada, opposed the change and 41 countries chose not to vote. Therefore, based on Barron’s definition, Palestine cannot be recognized as a state because it is not recognized by the international community.
If the criteria of a state is broadened to include the elements of International Law mentioned in the article, then the ongoing territorial disputes with Israel provide evidence that shows that Palestine can not unquestionably be considered peace-loving.  So, by many definitions, Palestine did not become a state when its UN status changed.  For the Palestinian people, nothing changed. Ultimalely, the UN called for negotiations to be resumed with a goal of achieving a two-nation state. This will likely be an ongoing spatial conflict and for now, Palestine remains a statelesss nation.

To better understand the article, I reviewed the UN General Assembly document that included details about how countries, especially Canada, voted.

No comments:

Post a Comment